MAB-scriptieprijs
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- TabsTabs
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
-
Article title
-
Abstract
-
Keywords
-
Relevance to practice
-
1. Introduction
-
2. Literature review
-
2.1. Audit quality frameworks
-
2.2. Expectation gap
-
2.3. Audit quality disclosures and investor perception
-
2.4. Partner and manager involvement as a signal of audit quality
-
2.5. The remediating role of training disclosures in investor judgement
-
-
3. Research method
-
3.1. Participants and experimental design
-
3.2. Variables and manipulation
-
Independent Variable (IV): partner and manager involvement
-
Moderating Variable (MV): training hours
-
Dependent Variables (DVs)
-
-
3.3. Data analysis
-
-
4. Results
-
4.1. Manipulation and randomization
-
4.2. Main effects of the level of partner and manager involvement
-
4.3. Remediating effects of an additional training hours disclosure
-
4.3.1. Perceived financial reporting reliability
-
4.3.2. Investment likelihood
-
-
-
5. Discussion
-
5.1. Discussion of findings
-
5.2. Practical and theoretical implications
-
5.3. Limitations and future research
-
-
References
-
Appendix 1
-
Appendix 2
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories