Other versions:
XML
PDF
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CitationCitation
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Article title
  • 1. Introduction
  • 1. Knowledge transfer: status quo
    • Communication gap between academics and practitioners
  • 2. How should things be done
    • Academic research is sticky
    • Codified versus tacit knowledge
    • Knowledge gap: production versus action
    • Comparison of four strategies for knowledge transfer
    • ‘Social experiments’
    • Isolated worlds
  • 3. Evidence based medicine: what can auditing research learn from it
    • Widely supported knowledge cycle
    • Systematic literature synthesis
    • Iterative process
    • Joint working groups
    • From evidence-based to evidence-informed
    • More research ‘upon order’
  • 4. A field case: current FAR experiences
    • Three experiences
    • Exchanging ideas
    • Academics have their own language
    • Learn from each other
    • First hurdle cleared
  • A discussion with Steven Salterio during the FAR conference: a brief impression
  • References
Powered by